Whether the court erred in dismissing petitioner's amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence based on a procedural bar

No question identified. : | QUESTIONCS) PRESENTED L Dib THE strict COURT_ERRED DsMies: ING _WIAIGHT/S AMENDED 5.2955 MOTION TO 5 _ VACATE SET ASIDED CR CORRECT SENTENCE __TContsrRUCTIVE AMENDMENT (2D CLAIND [ASS PROCEDUBAL LS BARRED | | | | | | | | : I | | | | | | | | _ | | Le | | | LISTOE PARTIES | Holly be Gerstoo—_—_—_ | nesishont YS. Adeney | Dip chek appetite SuSOn | Blond Rac No. S85b0 —-A00_M Tampa, St. Stree 3200 | | RELATED Cases | Dnitel Stobes My Mie Wnt, No. 6.16 = ___ lems cana CKKMLDCSPE)CMLD Ets, sone oa 0bh) _ us awe Me a-ada-Db [Wirth Vitel Shobes. 6411 Fel Appi Loe. sort Ss ben ENS AIG Na AGT IAOSe | 7 : _ | a | ee | ee ee 6 a | ; ESTIOM PREBENTED | ABLE OF ATHORIDES = RAMON BELOW | WRISOICTION , | CONSTITUTIONAL PRQVISONINIMOLMED | B EASON FOR GRANTING THE PETITION "TRO err WUE AID OEE Conan | APPELLATE SLiBtc JON ARrENIDL | ee ae _TEXCEPTIONAL CIRCLMSTANCES \WARRANTOTHE — EXCERCISE _OF THE COURT IISCRETONARY ROWER DEQuATE RELIEF CANNOT BE OBTALNLIN ANY FORM RR SOM ANC CEE COT 8 re en