No. 24-5492
Jalen Rashad Pasley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure deprivation-of-liberty fifth-amendment individualized-assessment sentencing-conditions supervised-release
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court must orally pronounce standard conditions of supervised release and assess their reasonableness under the Fifth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Under the Fifth Amendment, is a district court required to orally pronounce at sentencing all discretionary “standard conditions” of supervised release and to make an individualized assessment as to whether those conditions are reasonably related to the sentencing factors and involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary under the circumstances? 1
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Jalen Rashad Pasley
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent