No. 24-5500

Terris Chanley Baker v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy criminal-procedure evidence-standard federal-rule-of-evidence probative-knowledge whether-character-evidence
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether character evidence dated after the conclusion of a conspiracy is probative of knowledge under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether character evidence dated after the conclusion of a conspiracy is probative of knowledge under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)? Il. What procedure does the Sixth Amendment mandate a district court follow upon the government’s denial of a defendant’s request for a federal agent to testify at trial pursuant to regulations promulgated in accordance with U.S. ex. Rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951)? II. Whether it is unconstitutionally coercive for a district court to state that it will take a defendant into custody if he continues to diligently pursue his request for new counsel? i LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Terris Baker
Kyle SchroaderStites & Harbison, PLLC, Petitioner
Kyle SchroaderStites & Harbison, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent