Whether the November hair/shotgun residue report under Division of Forensic Sciences Case was properly handled and admitted as evidence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Why wens the November 14,3018, gunshot residwe report under Division of Forensic Sciences Corsets 0 hoes 47 | etal Bureaw eroa@na i » Mc r of Tnveqtge Sault omer’ plas (Bradg Violation) mmagne . ‘wry return wbill of indictment after adjournment asCan a9 ore inl orto petiti oner (ia-B-A7145-3) t an) 3.Ln relastion to Det. Robingon’s trial testimon of toting live rounds From his duty magezine handgun en Pa ndthem int the dusty magazine of the olleaed murder we pon P ore admission info ence loa,Can Co explanation be made ov out the handling physical eWdence diy ing the chain of custody f .Why petitioner wass denied right to effective assistance of counsel ost er disgovery of pre-trial letter displaying violastion oPasttorned/ client jail conv rsations instucted by trial prosecutor? 5.Upon inconsistent trial test! many of state witnesses, Should have the court been held in contempt dwe to penjurg? b.Dwe-+4o the criminalcharaes browaht against former trial jadae Schrader and Ed Kramer fn aol4 a ong a 006 court eatin of the-+two(Case+ Ob-h:08486 3 Fi edaste Oa/al !a006),Why hosn te every ase. esided over’ been reviewe ov poop of violah ng petit oner’s ri ght +o Due Process (conflict of interest) ? . . 7.Wh iar Supreme Cowrt Chief Justice Hovrold Melton si SS ce il cased Baha Sa alc Esta OVO 10 : witness Ronold Colting(penyuredt edtimony Mt 8.wWhy Certified court Reporters Becky Pearrow and Bristi Steftey omit State witness Det. Robertson’s manend pistinoy Bond hearing testimon qcontirming negative ballistics test regaits aulon with trtoul testim 4 sci itt 1g how | ng “spare bwlletsitn Ks recit locker box from peti ioner’s Codort transcript? (Foulsification oe court documents)