No. 24-5510

Dawayne Rolin Walker v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2024-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-procedure witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The jN-Coutt dew Licabion Was Clearly Suagested , betause the witwess Was just shown « phots of MG Walker Mowths before his preliminary CLOMIN Ot OM o ME Walkel Never had a proper Fhoto lineup becouse he Was the only photo Showw fo te Witvess add Was wevec placed iv P f a photo actay, Which Was aw impepes like ald wcomstitiowal Violation OF juse Show ina him Siwoly +o a Witsless « The State Violated MC, Welker Canftowtadiow Craht+s +0 Coss examine the Head detective at Tera by nek having Yhe lead detective teshty ak trial, His testimony a log Could have Chadged the outcome of the Susy Verdict. Me. Walker iS question ins the cledibilty of the Wwitwess jdewst fication and Testimony + The Witwess Stoted on Multigle police (egacrs, She did See owvone , because Hey both had Mask ow aud ib happen +o fas+,

Docket Entries

2024-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Dawayne Rolin Walker
Dawayne Rolin Walker — Petitioner
Dawayne Rolin Walker — Petitioner