Whether a judge can waive judicial immunity by fabricating a post-trial judgment and sentence that falsely purports jury findings, and whether successive lawsuits can bar an actually innocent person from bringing a lawsuit under Heck v. Humphrey

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (S. Ct. Rule 14,1 (a) ) \ QUESTION No.1 (Actual Innocence) ? After the jury found Petitioner guilty of one offense, Did Petitioner's prosecution end without a conviction after the judge affirmately exonerated Petitioner by charging the jury to sentence Petitioner in an offense not charged in the indictment nor before the jury in any capacity. ?. QUESTION No.2 (Coverup by the Judge) ? Did the judge effectively waive all immunity from suit by commiting a act in the clear absence of all to coverup the fact that,"prior to the judge dismissing the jury,the jury never made the mandatory sentence in the offense it found the obt Ch. Petitioner guilty of and , thereafter|the judge fabricate a posttrial judgment and sentence that falsely purport that the jury both found Petitioner guilty and sentenced him in the same offense that the jury found him guilty”. ? QUESTION No.3 (Illegal bar). Can successive lawsuit ,under Heck V.Humphrey, 512 S.Ct, 477 (1994),and 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 (e) , ever be legally and constitutionally applied to bar an actually innocent person from bringing a lawsuit ? : ii 7