Whether the district court erred in denying Utter's objections to sentencing enhancements for brandishing a firearm, abducting a bank employee, and carjacking during a robbery offense

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the district court erred in denying Utter’s objection to the United States Probation Officer’s 5 level enhancement to his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2B3.1(b)(2)(C) for purportedly brandishing a firearm during the commission of the robbery offense. 2. Whether the district court erred in denying Utter’s objection to the United States Probation Officer’s 4 level enhancement to his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2B3.1(b)(4)(A) for purportedly abducting a bank employee during the commission of the robbery offense. 3. Whether the district court erred in denying Utter’s objection to the United States Probation Officer’s 2 level enhancement to his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2B3.1(b)(5) for the robbery offense purportedly involving carjacking. i RULE 14.1(b)7) STATEMENT There are no parties in addition to those listed in the caption. RULE 14.1(b)Gii) STATEMENT United States v. Clint Monroe Utter, 1:20-CR-96-1, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. Judgment entered November 5, 2021. United States v. Clint Monroe Utter, No. 21-4645, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Judgment entered June 28, 2024. ii