No. 24-5544
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: autopsy-report confrontation-clause crawford-standard criminal-procedure homicide-investigation testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a certified autopsy report created as part of a homicide investigation is 'testimonial' under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. Washington
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a certified autopsy report—created as part of a homicide investigation and asserting that the cause of death was homicide—is “testimonial” under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)?
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-03
Reply of petitioner Evan Wald filed. (Distributed)
2024-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-06
Brief of New York in opposition submitted.
2024-11-06
Brief of respondent New York in opposition filed.
2024-10-07
Response Requested. (Due November 6, 2024)
2024-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2024-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2024)
2024-08-18
Application (24A172) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 18, 2024.
2024-08-09
Application (24A172) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 19, 2024 to September 18, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Evan Wald
Jan Hoth — Center for Appel. Litigation, Petitioner
New York
Steven Chiajon Wu — New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent