No. 24-5549
Norman Paul Felts v. United States
Tags: appellate-procedure fourth-circuit-review ineffective-assistance legal-abandonment pro-se-representation timeliness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit should have considered an untimely appeal due to alleged attorney abandonment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Should the Fourth Circuit have addressed the merits of Petitioner’s appeal even though it was untimely filed because he alleged that his counsel “abandoned” him so the court should have treated him as unrepresented? ii LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2024-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Norman Felts
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent