$/ Ldi)£-/iif.b-tli£ Pe>th\JAto}n* Cou/jf? Jld £ov2h£ \<}hf
BuHioh'/i 1/ ot Jiih'Sd JcHarJ ioPtb>£f.C»t? ' hftit'iVL HYnzViCudS^
■ , j t A'S.Vu/V diSZsiv^teJ ISsf'ulEtJDE.
ttk-iht h -lht P1 ih\jRjo}r) I CsvJl Cou/J ckht PdihnA£p
fab &tiot a
»°ty£ Li/b JiS CovihJ kYi<h.?JC£
I f1 loldliP ihf Pdhufitoki > toutjhtf had fidviSfd PePiPg^P
tfsziv/ip «*
j I Ini J— distorted AViJ^CLttfiP Ff£i- ^yp fatten*. v/^Jm,i,o^ths CoAlShfaturifilKishiS ?
st en
t S> &

Whether the Petition Court has jurisdiction to review the Petition's claims of distorted evidence and procedural irregularities