No. 24-5558
Bryant D. Aron v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fairness-doctrine federal-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion plea-agreement review-standard sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's ambiguous status regarding a plea agreement under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) should be considered accepted by a reviewing court for fairness to the parties
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Plea agreements under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) bind a district court if the court accepts the agreement. A district court can also reject the agreement or defer pending the completion of a presentence investigation report. If a district court does not explicitly do any of the three options, and the status is ambiguous heading into a sentencing hearing, should a reviewing court consider the agreement accepted out of fairness to the parties? ii
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2024)
2024-07-03
Application (23A1170) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until September 13, 2024.
2024-06-27
Application (23A1170) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 15, 2024 to September 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Bryant D. Aron
Adam Clay Stevenson — University of Wisconsin Law School, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent