No. 24-5565

In Re Francisco Nunez Carrillo

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy punishment-limits single-act-doctrine statutory-construction
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

Cbas, *, iMf.pUotooS ftose.oo'V'of' v)'wVte. V*- dooWe. (feWVions of fV>«- OruteJt sbjfts Consfi+v/Vi'on ooj Artick. 2 S lo c£ "flne_ Af« ConsVv-W^ocv, eoeA uoben Coo^ oVt'flAa-VeVY ^fo9eS CoAcorferint SertWce,S, 7

iQuesV^orT?! Cbes T*\«- PdWcYUV CMUtei^A CanS<LQo«cLr\C£-S ib*V ^*>( not *>e_ ignore.^ \ vose <*33r*A/*^ assavj YV ojTi'sIa^ fta**- <*. Si'n^ic A<t xs vn § V3^K tf), Gyvstitoks a SUgk 0fFms^ 1Yi«t V>*- CofAAM Hdi m Se-J^V v

[qo^sV' ort^] -Xf TVrt. nlkjel VV*.t <v person (Vrfbrmcd <\ SJrv^k V^t VwUfrin) tV*t ^VW vn <v oioviaA Ho <x S^Ve vjvxcV'rv\ vajoo VA t+ be. error cUsKct Geort Oot 'bo \J<\c«vV«. on?, of tbe_ Coynts be&r^ joA^nvent <vni SenWve^ 7

(Oots^onX^Cpac'j rre./\V 'benVence,'ZoAtfV A^criWe Congress^ \nW\tto cvjeU iVvjbsv'n* pvJpSW^^t-5 £>r a Single Ac.t aaA \f So uOooU tf 4kc+ tV^ Un^UW^orfgM.'c r^t^n rf joilaVl (f««ti.'A, S ?

^ooVd ^Cof\\j ivcV<V0fj l.jfe. be WJUAvervWW ut\Ur ^ °L^ VU<l lAiVt; piiotoos ^rwfct>oA (SS^ ctxs H "W" ^wKtA$zj £*££.

'A fr'SoA'^L fW-cstion (\<td <v\\v( *-Wn * s^ic a0!i-W vt^v, ^ fo>S*coV^ A's ^bU^to brvV^ QW 3es iVcr^ ^ tV1®- A'i&ynia^f uO,V,\ Y)l Coa\KVW On Cg\R. or fAof«. ^ 'Wo^QVl ^ "Hut ^<V t'wV (fej!vvi«yfV W-S b^n ACtesVc^C

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a person convicted of a single act can be subjected to multiple punishments under congressional statutes and if such punishment violates constitutional protections

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-05

Attorneys

Nunez Carrillo, In Re Francisco
Francisco Nunez Carrillo — Petitioner