Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals improperly denied habeas corpus relief by failing to consider procedural due process violations

estions Presented to TE Liotoran Rcthes nd Relekd Cases in tr Table oF Content ue IW Tabb oF Authesrt7 wilt NZ Petition Feo wrt oF Ceshetari; OPimen Belew a MT Tuysditions Constitubbon. one vTetutery Pransien invelved — 2 it Statement ™~ 5 VOI = S110 AWO FANS V1579 Be De Micgarhh) Reset MBIT Cediin 3B OF Scheele . TR = Reason Fer Grarhns he weit 10 XX Conclusion ) XL Proo¥ 6 Sevice ie INOEX To APENDILES AfPennix A Disterct Gach Docket Sheet Pf Fendin 6 Schedudivg Ofsdes ApEn Dix C Disover? Ofdee Memosanpuny APPERDIK OD DeFendants Raves fic Eterion APPEND E Courk OSdcl Srariw4y Deldents motion Fer exhyhon Arrapk FF Mmnde Sheet APréeopra @ Coury O(del Stantng defendants 2rd cutution APPAPK WH Court ofder DSmissing Cote ognwd oe. Nicgacsh APPEMDIX To Cour) order denvor9 Plaiwhi€ nition Fey Sandon APPENDK TF Coot ofder Baoding Summar) Dude ment to deSerdeats APPER DS K Elevokh Civturt Quad oF Athrals are mn 4 Tudsye mone Rppewpir Lb Eleveoth Ciceush CoA Denied PellSon Fol eobene APPERDIK. M Eleventh Grim COA Sudsemens. . TABLE OF Authority CLASES + Page etling V.Mekiny ey Si U5. 25,33, 13 5.cF 2475 C1443) 1 Daniey vi Alien S¥d F.3d 1248,1315 (lia 20s) re Curly V. Keak 13 FisuPe 28 237,237 (50.N7. 262i) ue Ramos vi Lamm 629 F.3d $59, $23 LIOLY IG $e) 1 Farmec Vv» Brennan, $1) as. 825 (1499) 0 ESteite ViGam bie 429 US. 97,103 (1974) 12 Shomo yi Crh) oF Nes YOK, 579 F. 3 17S, 13462 E0€ 204) 12 Kochane Vi FL. DefT-c¥ Core 973 F138 1263,127), 1264 12 Su ton vs Wwhiaht 265 Rsupe 2d 292,32 (3:0-N), (223) 13 lavendecv: Com port 243 F, Supe 32), BYS 3 “STATUES Awd Rules ; United states constitution Arm erdmeot Vill *y 2125 Feoeert Rule oF Cron PRecepurRE Rul & (b)(B) 34 LR 7.1 0b) 5 Ruste. No (b)L4) 3 Rul e.3 3,14 28.u,6.6 3 254 C1) 2 Rale 1& Co) (1) 0) ; Rede ye (24) Or) ay Li & (3) re Rul & (0) 4 Gant NOW IN THE SUPREME CoureTt oF THE UNTTED STATES Curt Hunter, PertioneR, V. Rivetbend Cortectionat Facil, Resven pews, On Petition For a Writ oF Certiotat) +2 the Unrted States COurk oF Atfeals fer the Eleuenth Civcure PETITION FOR WRIT OF CéRTIORARI Curbs Hunter, a formec inmek incarcerated at Rivetbend Corfectional Facility im WiledseiW Go. fr Se Kasechally Petibens Wis Cowh Fore wok oF Cectoraci te favies the Tudgemen} oF the Eleventh Circuit Couvh oF Aereds. OP inion BELOW ‘The deeision by the Eleventh Cicutt GouvhoF APpPads,denting Petrhonec Aitedt APP 75 [clotted @ Curtis Hunter v. Rwethend Correctivnal Feed. etal. 22-11694-AA WoW Atcament Calender, Foo mer Pabrish). The Eleventh Cicut Curt oF Afpeals denied Petitioners Fetrhen for Feleating, <vbenc on June 18.2224, June 24,2024, TDuirisorr wn Petitioner Peon for (cheanns. hear enbanc +o tHe Eleveath Civank Couct oF A Peak wes denicd on June 19,2024 Ture 24 ze24, Peditvoner inuckes nis Couce Jwroatton under 28 U56 § 12540) pheoms timely Fried Mite Rebiten fee aunt eF Cechocasi within 00 days OF He Eleventh Grant Coady & AepedS Jurgen ent. Consniranen And STATORY P2onsiovs wvolved UMTED STATES LonSTITLOIN AMEnamens Vit Esessive ber| shat not be Cequieds wid excessive Fines imfoser inet Cruc\ end unusual Ronrimeat iaF)itted. Fedeval Kulet oF Cuil Recedire Inusdvea The Fed.B. Gv. PR were. Firsic adeticd PYthe Sufreme Court 19 1437 ond loecame eFFective in 14939 The Federa) Rules oF Gurl Pretedure (R26?) Seven Cis! Preceedivas in U.s: Districh Grusls, usith the Jou! OF enSuring het cuecy achon TS determined Fairly, Sucks, and meddensively. Ci