Whether the North Carolina General Assembly's act of assembling criminal statutes into law conflicts with state court jurisdiction and due process for repeat offenders

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : ES LT A FACLRALLY LIACON STZITUTIANAL ACT OF THE A.C. GENERAL ASSEAABRLY TO ASSEMBLE C1) CREAKKNAL STATUSES ZAITA Alc. @.5./4-7. 1 Far STATE COURT ENHAAICEMENT OF REPEAT OF FEAR SEAR TENCESS | DID IALAKE. COL/AITY SUPERIOR COURT ETUNGE KEITH O. GReEéGaRy MANY GLASS AGGARSS TA COLIRTS ) BY HAUING RETALLTORY FX —-PARTE HEARZAIG , NEPRIVIAC PLATA TREE OF His ALG@GHT Ta BE HEARD AKIN ORDERING HERS CASH ANUARBBR QDQCNSAIZIGO Ta BE ALTS— MOSSE IALETH PRE AOALCR ON UAKANGIAA NATE ) TIAWE ANID GRAAL MDSE . DINK STATE GAVENAR ABUSE. Hzs DESCrE TIGN TN FIADIAIG GEAIERAL ASSEMBLY ACT ASSBMBLWE CREAGILNAL STATUSES ENTO CRIAAT NAL STATUTES MOT FACTALLY LINCONSTLTUTIGNALP DIN STATE COURT ABUSE DESCRETION IN ITS FARLLLIRE TO TRANFER CASA TA GB) ALDEE PANEL For PRadKSS ) AFTER PLALANTIFF CLALANEN FACTAL LINGONSTETUTIOANAL. FOR GENERAL ASSEANBLY TO ASSEAABLY CRINALDAAL STATLISES LNTA STATUTE FOR STATE COURT US& ZAI EAIHAAICIAIG REPEAT OFFER DER SENTEMLESD A STATR LOWER COURT HAS Dec CDEN FENERAL QAUESTnow LAl AARNINER THAT CONFLICLS WITH TS EARLIER -LSTON OA LDEATICAL. TISSUE, ‘ : |