No. 24-5576
Jose Antonio Campos-Esqueda v. United States
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure firearms-possession interstate-commerce second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) is constitutional under the Second Amendment and whether conviction for firearm possession based on interstate travel is permissible
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment? II. Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional? i
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Jose Campos-Esqueda
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent