Whether the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals and District Court of Western Pennsylvania erred through arbitrary and capricious abuse of discretion in handling a jurisdictional dispute involving removal of a state court complaint

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Q1) Whether, the 3rd circuit court of Appeal and district court of Western Pennsylvania, erred by Arbitrary, Capricious abuse of discretion by deliberate indifference ( Wilful Blindness ) of the collateral order doctrine pursuant to 28 USC §1292 et seq, by summarily denying petitioner/ appellant's appeal at No. _ 24-1208. See Ca3 docket ECF # 42, 43, 74. 75 & 76, inter alia. Q2) Whether, the 3rd circuit court of Appeal and district court of Western Pennsylvania, erred by Arbitrary, Capricious abuse of discretion by deliberate indifference ( Wilful Blindness ) of the lack of standing of the to remove the complaint GD23-12632 filed on October 31, 2023 at State of Pa Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas (ACCPC). For reasons that include but not limited to the following: a) The defaulted on November 21, 2023 by failing to respond to the mandatory Notice to defendant and Pa RCP 1026 notice to Plead. And failed to cure the default . See Ca3 ECF 42, 43, & 75, inter alia. i) This is a violation of 28 USC §1446(b)(1)., which required the defendants to file a response ( notice of Removal ) on or BEFORE _the shorter time period of twenty (20) days rather than 30 days: ii) Removal of complaint is not a discretionary issue/matter but a Jurisdictional issue and a collateral_issues pursuant to 28 USC §1292 b) The failed to file at ACCPC, Preliminanry objections pursuant to Pa RCP 1028 et seq, and hence, waived all rights to the following: i) Waived objections as to Venue, forum, jurisdiction, and right to removal of plaintiffs Complaint, pursuant to Pa RCP , 1028(a)(2) et seq and 28 USC § 1442(a)(1) et seg, and 28 USC §1446(b)(1) et seq; -2 ° z ii) Waived all rights to new matter affirmative defenses and CounterClaims , pursuant to Pa RCP 1030 & 1031 et seq; and iii) Waived all rights to subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Pa RCP 1032 et seq; and iv) Defendants admitted to all 41 counts in plaintiff's original complaint at GD23-12632: v) improper and unlawful removal Notice for complaint dated December 6, 2023 was six days late in violation of the 30 day rule 28 USC § 1446(b)(1) et seq; And more than 16 days late using the 20 day rule in 28 USC §1446(b)*1) See Allegheny County Common Pleas Court docket GD23-12632: vi) In Short, respondents’ defaulted on Nov 21, 2023 and respondent DHHS has no standing to file a notice of removal on Dec 6, 2023 at ACCPC or on December 1 at Federal District Court PaWD; vii) Inter alia _ Q3) Whether, the 3rd circuit court of Appeal and district court of Western Pennsylvania, erred by Arbitrary, Capricious abuse of discretion by deliberate indifference ( Wilful Blindness ) and violated the separation of powers ( between Judiciary and DOJ) and acted as " servants" of the DOJ . Corruption of the Judiciary is prejudicial and violates the petitioner's constitutional rights of an independent Judiciary and " Equal Protection clause"under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. . See Ca3 docket ECF # 42, 43.&75 , inter alia. Q4) Whether, the 3rd circuit court of Appeal and district court of Western Pennsylvania, erred by Arbitrary, Capricious abuse of discretion by deliberate ___ indifference ( Wilful Blindness ) and violated the constitutional rights of by ignoring the improper removal and " hijacking of the complaint" from the state court of Pa; and . a) Nameless attorneys and clerks in the DOJ circumvented the "due process safeguards and procedures " and ordered (unrecorded phone -3 ao & line) the clerks in the state court ( Allegheny County Common Pleas Court) to cancel the hearing ( lawfully scheduled /calendared on March 4, 2024) and engaged in ex parte communications with the the clerks of General motions court of Allegheny County Common Pleas court of Pittsburgh Pa; See ECF 33, Honorable Judge Klein's order dated March 22, 2024: Q5). Whether, the 3rd circuit court of Appeal and district court of Western Pennsylvania, erred by Arbitrary, Capricious abuse of discretion by delibe