Whether the Sixth Circuit erroneously reversed the District Court's grant of habeas relief based on trial counsel's ineffective assistance in failing to raise the preclusive effect of sentencing findings in a subsequent criminal proceeding

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Circuit erroneously reversed the District Courts grant of habeas relief based on trial counsels ineffective assistance in failing to raise the preclusive effect of sentencing findings in a subsequent criminal proceeding, where state law recognizes collateral estoppel as a defense. (i)