Should Homeowners Associations be subject to quarterly state regulation to prevent board abuse and ensure proper property management?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Public Interest. Should a Homeowners AssociationProperty Owners Association be regulated quarterly by the State Government like a Condo Owners Association is in Florida? HOAs and POAs need to insure proper maintenance of the Association property and the expense, abide by the Constitution both US and Florida which prohibits contract interference of the governing ‘ documents with new laws, whereby they cannot try to enforce new laws that are not applicable, protect private resident’s property within compliance of the rules, prevent burglary and trespass, issue proper billing invoices for amounts due on time to each resident every quarter, and avoid excessive billing amounts, staff proper security, and respect residents and don’t abuse them with unreasonable fees billed to them; and avoidance of abuse by board members who don’t know the laws and act prejudice against some residents, or in their own benefit, which is unfair and a conflict. HOA’s are run by retired residents who are not professional, rarely have CEO experience, and therefore do not act professionally, causing too many problems for homeowners. . ‘ Because of the constant abuse toward residents, the HOAs need to be regulated by Neutral State Officials at least quarterly. 2. Conflict between Courts. The US Court of Appeals 11* Circuit has entered a decision in conflict with all other decisions of other United Stated Court of Appeals on the same important matter, causing conflict. Because I am not a lawyer? Or because the 11th Circuit picked the new Judge Burgess for the Trial court and does not want to overrule him. Should the Court of Appeals 11 Circuit adhere to the final order of the Confirmation Order of my chapter 13 case 3:10-bk-07291 or stray from the rule and follow the preconfirmation order and the proposed plan ignoring the Confirmation Order when the Confirmation Order changed both ‘ the proposed plan and the preconfirmation Order and stated that this ruling in the Confirmation Order now supersedes anything else stated differently in the Confirmed Plan. The issue is the power of the Confirmation Order of a Chapter 13 case with extra terms and conditions in the Order which adds to the proposed plan more duties and conditions that must be followed. The Confirmation Order combined with the proposed plan, together make up the FINAL PLAN of the case that all parties in the case must abide by, not just those in the plan, but those outside the plan too. 2 RELATED CASES , Federal-Directly 23-11705 US Court of Appeal 11 Circuit Affirmed Below : May 30, 2024 (Do Not Publish) Denied Rehear June 25, 2024 3:22-cv-1022 US District Court Middle District Fl Affirmed below April 21, 2023 Denied Rehear May 2, 2023 3:10-bk-07291 US Bankruptcy Court Middle District Jax FL Denied Sanctions August 9, 2022 , . Denied Rehear September 2, 2022 Confirmation Order 3:10-bk-07291 with attached proposed plan Dec 19, 2012 “both” collectively are the final plan applying to all parties in the case.