Laura Marie Baldwin v. Joshua Devine, et al.
DueProcess FourthAmendment Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether a state citizen can challenge the jurisdictional authority of state courts and prosecutors in classifying land and filing criminal complaints without demonstrable evidence of consent or lawful joinder
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. When did Petitioner, a private State Citizen and “one of the people,” knowingly waive her rights to become subject to the corporate STATE OF MISSOURI statutes? 2. Where is the wet-ink signed international contract with full disclosure, which Petitioner had to have signed, to become subject to the statutory code she has “allegedly” breached? 3. Under what authority does Walter Jording (Jody) Paschal (hereinafter Mr. Paschal) Assessor continue to wrongfully classify Petitioner's private Land Patented land as the COMMERCIAL terms Residential/ Agricultural? 4. Where does Mr. Paschal derive his authority to deny Petitioner's Constitutionally protected right to own land? 5. Why didn’t Mr. Pashal rebut the “allegedly” fraudulent documents when they were initially sent to him beginning in December 2021 as part of Petitioner's Administrative Process? 4 6. How can “one of the people” be charged by the STATE OF MISSOURI without lawful joinder? . 7. Under what authority does Paul M. Wade (hereinafter Mr. Wade), Special Prosecutor, act when he files a felony complaint with no verifiable evidence of an articulable defect in any of Petitioner's documents he claims are fraudulent? 8. Under what authority does Judge Joshua Devine (hereinafter Judge Devine) act when he fails to take judicial cognizance of Petitioner's filed standing as a State Citizen and not dismiss the case? 9. Under what authority does Judge Devine deny entering the Nature of the action on the record as requested by Petitioner pursuant to her 6th Amendment protected right to know? 10. Under what authority does Judge Devine refuse to dismiss the case upon verbal motion by Petitioner when Mr. Wade failed to appear for court Oct. 23, 2023? 11. Under what authority did Judge Stephen Bough fail to take judicial notice of Petitioner’s Amended Complaint error correction of the miswritten 5 USC 552-557 as being her Administrative remedy? 12. Under what authority did Judge Stephen Bough then dismiss Petitioner’s Complaint with prejudice on January 3, 2024 without standing as an Article III court as requested? 13. Under what authority does Judge Mary R. Russell dismiss the Writ of Mandamus on March 5, 2024, preventing Petitioner’s protected right to be informed of the Nature of the action further denying Petitioner’s due process?