Whether a criminal defendant's right to be physically present during trial can be abridged when the defendant is absent voluntarily after the trial has commenced

No question identified. : r . Cues THOA'S bre sev TED /15 UTAH R CRing. FP. 17 Ca) (2) CONSTITUTIONAL ° Ruceé $3 i THE ANITEDO STATES THE CouRT UNRAHMCUELY (ELD, 7 RAM OPM) URITTER BY LUSTIEE HARRY BLACK MIU? THAT RULE YB OLES NOT PERMIT THE TRIAL IN AbSERTIA CE A DE FEROANT We (8 FESKVT AIT THE BECINUWE. OF TRIAL. en ( THE TYPICAL SCENARIO USUALLY (NUVOKLES FO. DEFENDANT WHO FLEES PUDOTRIAL, FULLY AWARE ___. THAT H&E OR SHE (1S SUPPOSE Toe SHbic UP FOR CEURT_. ZACH AO BVERY DAY. RULE SF OF THE FEDERRL .. RULES .6F CRIMINAL. PROCEOURE CLEARLY STATES... THAT A DEFENDANT WRIVES THE RIGHT TOBE PRESENT .. JE BES “VOLUNTARILY ABSENT. PETER THE. TRIAL HAS... Commenced.” (UNTIL RECENTLY, PLOST STRTES. RULES. ON TRIALS 1 ROSENTIA WERE SIMILARLY WORDED.) 2. A BRiLdumPER WHO FOR FELTS..664D0 BY LVALKING, OUT. OF RB COURTHOUSE DURING RECESS.CERTAINGY FITS INTO... THIS CATEE GRE. ee UNTIL. RECENTLY, TRIRLS 1 PESENTIA. WERE EXCEEDINELY.. RARE 777087 SUDEES AWO PTTORNEYS les NEVER BE 1WUKVED WT ONG... THE PRELEDURE DoESnT.. JiBE Ld 1TH THE Mote OF DUE MOCESS ,. LSPECIALLY THE CONSTITUTIONAL LICHT. .OF THE ACCUSEO TE CONFRONT WITWESSES.. Se, VUOEES PRE. CAREFUL. TU PIRKE. SURE._THAT A DEFENDANTS RBESEMLE. 1S TRULY VOLUNTRRY, RATHER. THAN THE RESULT_OF FOUL PLAY, 1hL HEALTH, OR LACK OF NOTICE, AEST. THEY. CREATE .C ROUNDS FOR RPA APPEAL oi i ni ae eens ne In THE 1993 CASE CROSBY Vv. UNITED. STATES, THE SUPBEAE CourT RULED THAT FEDERAL LAW "' PROMLB ITS. THE TRIAL IM. ABSENTIA CF A DEFENOBRNT WHO iS NOT PRESENT AT THE BECINHEIC OF TRIAL. ) BY BRENDAN KOERNER Jue 192003 Wien CAN A DEFENDANT BE TRiep iN ABSENTIP OR CAM CRimiWaLS CE TRIED 1M AB SENTIA BY THE INTERNATIONRL CRIUMRAL Coulel. ARTILE G3 OF THE Rome sTprure, WHItH GOVERN THE [Co's OPERATION simfLy sTaTES “THE AkcuseD SHALL BE PRESENT DURING THE TRIAL" a UTAH R. Chim. Po ATWAS THE SAME FS ARTICLE £3 UTIL Exeérita (WOOD ties ooo Wit OPENS TRIAL IM AESENTIA 72 Ri CASES EXCEPT CFREUSES PURISHABLE BY DERTH. UrRa KR. CAM. P17 AS FENDER THBuCd MMR Y 23, 2623. STATES @) OEFEN DAMTS PRESEKLE. (V BLE CASES THE DEFEN DART SHPL HRUE THE RICAT FO PFFREPR ARO DEFEND pA! PERSON PL BY LOUIS EL. THE BEFEMDPNT SHALL BE FERSARLLY PRESENT PT THE TRIRL. (THIS PORTION OF 4PUDIS PESCLUTELY CONSTITUTIONAL, BUT THE EXCEPTIEM C2) C2) 13 1 CERF AICT, AAD GES DIRECTAY RPEPINST THESE Loa sTiTUTIOMAL BOR OS p) Wirititi A YIRTIER OF SENTENCES THIS. Lau) BECbMES CorlmuhIstTIC WSTEAO of COWSTITUTIGNAL ; aTRH R. CRIM P17 (8) (2) IN PRESECUTIGONS FOR OFFENSES... oT. PUNISHABLE BY DEATH, THE DEFENDORATS VOLUNTARY RESERCE FROM THE TRIAL AFTER Notice 70 OEFENMDANT OF THE | Tie FoR TRIAL SHAIL ACT FREVEWT THE, CASE FRom BEING TRIED PND A VERDIET OR JUDEEMERT ENTEREO THEREIN SHALL HALE _ THE SAME EFFECT AS IF DEFEMOANT HOD BEER PRESENT. ; THERE PORE CONCERN. PEFENOPNTS .PRESERCE (2) UTHH ARLE Ale DECIOED THAT THE DEFENDAAT sHau Be Peesenaity. PRESENT. BY THE TRIRk~ EXCEPTION @) G2) UNLESS DEFENDANT 1S PESENT.. Resunn THIS 15 NONSENSE. LAW. | to. . — ee 1S UTAK Cove seEcrica’ 2¢A-7-N C8) CoasriturionRE? “THE DECiSion! CF THE DISTRICT COURT “WA CPSE GRICIMATING ——_INA SiStile LouRT. 14 FINA AA AY Not BE BPPRERLED UNLESS THE DisSTRICT COURT. RULES On THE. COMSTITUTIONBLUTY _ OF A STATUTE OR ORDIWANER.» 2. THE DECISION oF THE | DiSTRICT COURT 15 FINAL ...; . (THis GiVES To MUCH POWER ) THE DiSTRICT COURT hisr Or Ferries ~ ALL PARTIES RPPERR Iw THE CAPTien OF THE COVER PACE OPWONS BEAOU) ¢ ¢ urkisdicroe CONSTITUTIONAL AUD STALUTORY Pravision's 2 MAR BURY vi Manisa ; 7 CKOS8Y V Uviren STATES 3 ARTICLE Vi LDURTEEDTH PMEND EWI Pa SULTH LOEW DIENT. _A2 FLED LEN D. PUERTO 3 ARTICLE 1 SECSIGM J oF TRE CONSTITUTION OF UTRH 3 STATEMENT aF THE CASE L : Heestal for Grow cine THE PETITION 12 COVLLUS/OM . ey IW EK TO APPERDICES _ BLPEM DIL A__ORDER OF SUMMARY DIS miss PL APPA faces [-3 ORDER DATED FEB. 27 2023 ; ; ;