No. 24-5638
Kareem Swinton v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: co-conspirator-statements constitutional-rights federal-rules-of-evidence fifth-amendment hearsay-testimony sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the admission of hearsay testimony from unidentified co-conspirators without knowledge of their identity violates constitutional rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether, in the absence of knowledge of the identity of the declarants, the admission of hearsay testimony of alleged co-conspirators is unconstitutional. i
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2024)
Attorneys
Kareem Swinton
Sarah Kunstler — Law Office of Sarah Kunstler, Petitioner
Sarah Kunstler — Law Office of Sarah Kunstler, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent