Whether a waiver by the US Department of Justice under Supreme Court Rule 15 constitutes an admission of the illegality of a criminal conviction

QUESTION PRESENTED Whoever avails himself of RULE 15 of the US Supreme Court and WAIVES to answer a Certiorari before said forum where a criminal conviction is challenged, recognizes with his WAIVER the invalidity of the contested conviction? SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS ON THE QUESTION SUBMITTED _On January 26, 2022, the US Department of Justice submitted to the Federal Supreme Court, in a decision unprecedented in its history, the WAIVER to respond to the questions of illegality of the federal criminal conviction #01-690(JAF) of June 7, 2002 outlined by the Petitioner in his Certiorari #21-6910 before said forum. The WAIVER was signed by Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar under the Rule 15 of the US Supreme Court. The Petitioner before the PR Court of Appeals stated that the WAIVER under Rule 15(1)(2) is an admission by the US Department of Justice of the illegality of his conviction #01-690(JAF). The Court of Appeals in its Judgment KLAN 202400474 alleges that Petitioner’s position is incorrect with respect to WAIVER under Rule 15(1)(2). The Court argued that the WAIVER of the Department of Justice under Rule 15 is not an admission of the illegality of conviction #01-690(JAF) challenged in Certiorari #21-6910. Given this erroneous interpretation of the PR Court of Appeals where it is stated that the WAIVER under Rule 152) to answer Certiorari #21-6910 has no consequences for the US Department of Justice, it is imperative that this Honorable Court address the Question submitted. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JUAN M. CRUZADO LAUREANO NO: Petitioner-Pro-Se On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto RicoCertiorari _ | CC-2024-304of the Court of AppealsPanel ICase no. KLAN 202400474 Vs. POPULAR DEMOCRATIC PARTY(PDP) AND ITS GOVERNING BOARD Respondent