No. 24-5656

Courtney Green v. Paramount

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-27
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights data-exploitation electronic-surveillance negligence network-regulation privacy-violation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Paramount acted negligently in addressing staff conduct and network integrity, and whether its data and spyware capabilities violated privacy laws and constitutional rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented Whether the respondent Paramount acted negligently in addressing the conduct of its staff and the integrity of its network. Did Paramount unconventionally use data and spyware capabilities in a manner that violated privacy laws, electronic and network regulations, statues and the petitioners constitutional rights. Did employees of the respondent Paramount participate in conduct that aided in corrupt intent and racketeer influenced acts; At the expense of The petitioners Character; were methods of unconsented surveillance in fact used to exploit, defame, profit, control, gather and distribute personal data and other findings about the petitioners person for ulterior motives?

Docket Entries

2024-11-25
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2023-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2024)

Attorneys

Courtney Green
Courtney Green — Petitioner
Courtney Green — Petitioner