Whether the appellate court's denial of a pro se appeal and failure to provide proper notice constitutes a due process violation

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; ; : FILED AN APPEAL Nov. 8TH a0a3, To ANOV.a,a3 SAFE TACT | DENTAL... APP. CRT CLERK CLAIMED APPEAL WAS UNTIMELY, REFILED FOR RENEARING WITH A SUPERVISORY. ORDER MARCH 26, . AOBN, PRO SE. APP COUNSEL WAS APPOINTED AGAINST My REQUEST FOR SELF REPRESETATION ) NEVER NOTIFIED OF HER . APPOINT MENT, COUNSEL NEVER USED APPELLANTS MOTIONS oR MERITS AND ARGUED IN FAVOR OF THE STATE UNTIMELY, USING AN INACCURATE HEARING DATE OF oct. 18) A0A3, WHERE HEARING _ WAS NOT APPEALLED. SUR ORDER FROM TLL. SUP. COURT. “ALLOW PETITIONERS APPEAL To BE HEARD BY ad DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT, USING PROPER DATES AND MERITSScHECK | _ DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS. oo Ci) a