Whether the evidence was legally insufficient to establish enterprise membership and whether a rational fact finder could have found the petitioner guilty of racketeering conspiracy and murder in aid of racketeering

QUESTIONS PRESENTED POINT 1: Whether the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that the petitioner was a member of an enterprise and whether any rational fact finder could have found him guilty of racketeering conspiracy and murder in aid of racketeering. POINT II: Whether the petitioner was denied his due process right to a fair trial by the erroneous admission of evidence of his state court firearm conviction. ii