No. 24-567

In Re Martin Akerman

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process mandamus rule-39.8 second-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Seventh Circuit erred in denying mandamus and whether the Supreme Court's application of Rule 39.8 violated due process and obstructed access to justice for an indigent litigant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit erred in denying the petition for writ of mandamus (Case No. 24-3028) on November 13, 2024, without consideration of the substantial . constitutional claims raised by the petitioner, thereby blocking any appellate review. Whether the Supreme Court's application of Rule 39.8, labeling the petitioner’s prior filing as frivolous, violated due process and imposed undue barriers on indigent litigants, stigmatizing legitimate claims and. . obstructing access to justice. Whether the cumulative actions of the lower courts and the Supreme Court infringed upon the petitioner's Second Amendment rights by effectively disarming the ‘ petitioner through administrative and legal sanctions without procedural safeguards or an avenue for appeal. ;

Docket Entries

2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2024-11-16
2024-11-16
Request for recusal received from petitioner.

Attorneys

In Re Martin Akerman
Martin Akerman — Petitioner
Martin Akerman — Petitioner