Whether a single factor of a parcel's state of origin is sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for seizure and whether a warrantless search of the parcel violated the Fourth Amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Given Deputy Twombly’s admission on the record (PageID #500, 9-14) that the only factor establishing reasonable suspicion to seize the Parcel was its state of origin being a "source state,” was this single factor sufficient? See, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 88 U.S. S.Ct. 1868 (1968) and United States v. Urrieta, 520 F.3d 569 (6th Cir. 2008). 2. Was the warrantless search of the Parcel an illegal search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment, given the standard established in Ex Parte Jackson, 24 LED 877, 96 US 727 (1878)?