No. 24-5688
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-provisions due-process federal-regulatory jurisdictional-issue statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED why WILE THE vuSpc wbky NOT ALLow ME TD DockéT CERTIFICATES OF Full FAITH Aww Cpepit 28 uc £1738 TO PPOVE ActruAL IvvoCEnce OF VvEty vl caser wity DoES ORDEZ (x log) FRAVDULERTLY CLA THAT VVERLyinh STATE CASE Dismissee on Sept, 27,2018 Bur STATE Court RELoge SHows (T MEYER Dismisseb® why DoES OLVER (om IbB) FRAVeULEnT Ly CLAIm THAT Fee e2At CUSTODY STARTS OcT |, 20/8 Bur THE Bop/ DoS Pecope SHowS cusony Spagrs Jory 27 20i8t . wily IS THE USDc wDicy Coverin up SpeEvy TRIAL ACT VISLATIOS oF THE 30-DAT Ageest=T0-Iwoicr Clock® ee are L TH cy | (oe wy wow T THE (TH QQ. move iv CASE wo.$ Gos | oR 23-Gobyr Th ISSUE man2Amus of peoHieirion ¢ "
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-02
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent