No. 24-5689

Joshua Paul Cox v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: district-court-review judicial-review jurist-standard lawyer-effectiveness legal-sufficiency sentencing-performance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a reasonable jurist might disagree with the district court or Judge Graves about the sufficiency and effect of the lawyer's performance at sentencing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is this: whether a reasonable jurist might disagree with the district court or Judge Graves about the sufficiency and effect of the lawyer’s performance at sentencing. i

Docket Entries

2024-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-10-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Joshua Cox
Taylor Wills Edwards Brown — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent