Whether the Georgia Supreme Court improperly denied the petitioner's habeas corpus petition by failing to review false evidence and potential Sixth Amendment right to counsel violations

No question identified. : QUES TIOUS PRESENTED L Will zhrs Court review the validity of the indick ment which iS @ double Jd &¢pardy Violakion by the Tiled date of return? As well as the court's lack of prooF of return yia minute Ctranserints) which has been the lew a Georgia Be over I00 years? 2.Uill ths Coort reviev the right end legality of the Georgia Supreme Court te re-write lew and chenge whet the General Assembly Sepplied as a deYined legal L£erm? 3. Will this Court review the Standard of whet Conseltvces proo} oF venve interms oF eu idence needed ok trial? 4. Will this Court review the standard of perjured evidence, what constitutes Jolee evidence, and the remedy o} such? S. Will this Court review how the Sixth Amendment right bo Counsel apples to post -indict ment int errogat ton and alter an at Virmegive right to counsel hes heen medeT?