Whether the state court violated the petitioner's due process rights by refusing to hear jurisdictional challenges and improperly constituting the grand jury process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. WHETHER PETITIONER'S CRITICAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT IS BEING CONTINUOUSLY DENIED/VICLATED, AND HIS STATUTORY RIGHT ENTIT-~ MENT IS BEING SEVERELY OVERLOOKED, CAUSING WRONGFUL IMPRISONMENT? 2. WHETHER THE STATE COURT ERRED BY REFUSING TO HEAR PETITIONER'S LEGITIMATE JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE WHEN IT LIMITED PETITIONER'S FILINGS TO THAT COURT, AND THAT COURT ONLY? 3. WHETHER THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT IS IN ERROR FINDING IT RETAINS AFTER NOTICING CLAIMS THE GRAND JURY PROCESS IN SOUTH CAROLINA, IS BUT A SHAM AND COVER, AND NOT PROPERLY CONSTITUTED UNDER _ ITS OWN CONSTITUTION, OR STATUTORY LAWS? . > ' ~