Whether unresolved factual issues in a § 2255 motion warrant an evidentiary hearing and potential habeas relief

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. If the § 2255 pleadings raised issues of fact, should those have been resolved by an evidentiary hearing? TI. Was the lack of an evidentiary hearing grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)(1)? III. Did the pleadings raise material issues of fact which, if true, would entitle Bartunek to habeas relief? : i