Whether federal rules 60(b) and 60(d)(3) protect petitioners from fraudulent judgments and whether the government can deny citizens contracts and use eminent domain to commandeer work proposals without compensation

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The following questions are presented. 1. Does FR 60(b)1 and FR 60(d)(3) protect petitioners from judgments that are fraudulent and filled with mistakes? : 2. Does “copyright inhere in authorship exists whether or not it is ever registered, with the United States Copyright Office?” 3. Can the Government deny citizens contracts and then use eminent domain to commandeer submitted work proposals with trademark inscriptions affixed in the course of business, indicating ownership, control, and origin of a work submitted, without compensating that citizen then use O.C.G.A §36-10-1 as their protective :. shield? . 4, Did the Court apply old laws when stating that the Petitioner needed to establish that Chattooga County was subject to suit when Georgia Law HB 1023 — allows the people of Georgia | to petition the court for relief from governmental acts done outside the scope of lawful authority | or which violate the laws of Georgia, the Constitution of Georgia, or the Constitution of the United : States (acts committed after January 2021)? 5. Can the Court ignore Georgia law, if Georgia law is determinative to the case? 6. Does Justice Robert’s protection against eminent domain go beyond tangible items (home, car, crops) to respective writings and discoveries?