Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts must apply the second step of Howes to determine if a person is 'in custody' for Miranda purposes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether courts must apply the second step of Howes to determine if a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes. prefix PARTIES,
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-19
Reply of Buta Singh submitted.
2024-12-19
Reply of petitioner Buta Singh filed. (Distributed)
2024-12-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-11-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2024.
2024-11-01
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-11-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 7, 2024 to December 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2024)
Attorneys
Buta Singh
Katie Hurrelbrink — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
Katie Hurrelbrink — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent