Whether the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel is violated when counsel fails to investigate or present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase of a capital trial

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED iL, Wale Gewese! Sixth. Amend mtaad wiehk ty offectyeass isteuce of caasel. a _ wislated when kh fs couusel “yelused Ae Leeuw lis tashicucdhiony omd ~ Failed te accept The hung jury, and Tailed to move fou misdyiad—_. Under the Shick land standard ? te vee Ar iWas Gower’ Sith Ameudmert wight fo effecklue assishance of commseai. — vielated when Wis counsel wéuld neh Leb tm or advised chim the met teskt ty on bis cutn Yehalt wnder the Syicklawl shaucland ? . By Wag Gower! Sw Amendment yf rat “to etheclive assistance. of counsel _ wa wickered when bis counsel adduced tiv, to wot tule hits inedteetious for . : depress lon cond pala weds po biel ts en Issue of Aya t Typress fou . Far th Csurt weder the Stictele lone sttundeard © . — . S. Wes Gomez! Sheth. Prneindmenk wight to eftlecklve ossidance...f ceumse| . __ Migleted _minen wis. cousel Patled. Ay ewesenk ui Se Deri nececk, APF es 2 itinctoa. Fourbeodty, Aumtndweret Due Prucese. mas. viclek ed when The titel _ ude lunar iatisibly incenfeced wits rhe stealth Wleta,oin tio ocoamious a “he spoestddeg \uacov ve ported cHlaeks Hse Guy cmialel wot acta. Qo 8 : Waanimeus Verdict as te al\ covents , the. jude 2. Ay ected. Yee, Seung Ae. _.. toetdinus ths detthermbous. wattwr toa 4 vatelaing. go. wastrel 8k