Question not identified.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FoR REVIEW | I) Did the S.C. Supreme Count Eanoa By Failing $5 Ceawd Petition ton Wait of Habeas Corpus fas Light of Cowsiderations fy Light of FRaweis Vs. Faawklin, Yates vs. Aiken to invalidate his Con victon due to impropee Burdew ~ Shitting . Liastructsy »Rule of Federal Const hts ue i bia, On the Ground that it had authority to | Geant Relief due to Petitioner Was on Dipect Review et the time of Shp vs. Belcher which merely aw A pplication of JoVenwing PRi weiple of Sand staom VS, Mowtawa thagDue Process Clause of Fourteen Y, Amesdmenst Feo hibit Juay Lastenetos that have the efey of relieving the State of its Burden of Proof . On the Critica | questi ow of intent Malice PAN Be infeed fom uge of deadly weapow IN 0 Caimi nal Prosecution ? / P a | LIST OF PaRTTESs . | mw All pAakes appear in the caption of the Cose ow the Cover | . Related Cages Seet Wait of Ceatorer? Baief ¢ Appesdix-A hersto Attached |. of |. l,