Anthony Raymoné Clark v. Oklahoma
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Whether the trial judge and state's attorney improperly created an impediment to a timely post-conviction application appeal
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED In my case | timely submitted my original post-conviction application and the trial Judge along with the state's attorney unreasonably created an impediment contrary to the procedural rules: RULE 5.2 APPEAL FROM FINAL JUDGEMENT : (A.) Final Judgment on Post-Conviction Application. The appeal to this Court : under the Post-Conviction Procedure Act constitutes an appeal from the issues raised, the record, and findings of fact and conclusions of law made in the District Court in non-capital cases. See Yingst v. State, 480 p.2d 276, 277 (Okla. Cr.1971). To state that the Oklahoma Criminal Court of Appeals had not affirmed the conviction on direct appeal, (See