No. 24-5732

In Re Jeremy Dewayne Foster

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-violation forum-transfer judicial-misconduct procedural-rules substantive-law writ-of-prohibition
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2025-03-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether judges in the Western District of Louisiana have improperly practiced law and violated plaintiff's substantive rights through procedural rules

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question(s) Presented 1. Why have Judge's of the Western District of Louisiana (Lake Charles) Division been Practicing Law? 2. Why have Plaintiff substantive rights been violated bv procedural rules? 3. Why is Plaintiff seeking Writ of Prohibition under rule 20.3(a) for ExtraOrdinary writ under U.S. Supreme court rules 28USCA 1651(a)? 4. Why didnt Judge and Mag. Judge change Forum 28usca 1631 when they seen that the suit was a-constitutional violation and Plaintiff was stating substantive Law? . | Index to Appendices. 1. Status check with notes and arrows of motion that was . filed and violated substantive rights by not answering. 2. R&R of mag. Judge dismissal without prejudice

Docket Entries

2025-03-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2024-12-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-09-30
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Jeremy D. Foster
Jeremy Dewayne Foster — Petitioner