No. 24-5734

In Re Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure default-judgment district-court judicial-discretion procedural-motion venue-transfer
Latest Conference: 2024-12-13
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question 1. Did the Plaintiff-Appellee answer the prospective New Complaint, which happened to be the Old Complaint under a New Time pursuant to Rule 59(a(2),e) ?

Question 2. Was the Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) from District 1 to District 2 proper?

Question 3. Did the Original Clerk of Court of District 1 act properly in Filing and Serving (Exhibit 12), "MOTION THAT JUDGE 'S ORDER OF 10/20/23 BE SET ASIDE AND LET THE CASE OF CITIZENSS BANK, NA V. SUBSTITUTE ABDUR-RAHIM DIB DUDAR CONTINUE ITS COURSE " Dated 11/06/2023 (Docket # 9)?

Question 4. Did the Original Clerk of Court of District 1 act properly in Filing and Serving (Exhibit 13), "DEFENDANT 'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST PLAINTIFF ", Dated 01/22/2024. (Docket #10) and serving it on both the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendant- appellant?

Question 5. Given the fact Questions 3 and 4 are True, would that entitle the Defendant- Appellant to a Default Judgment as a matter of Law?

Question 6. Did the Defendant-Appellant and Plaintiff-Appellee transfer the case from District 1 to District 2 on January 22.2024. properly?

Question 7. Did District 2 properly file the Notice of Appeal and the Docket on April 12,2024?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the transfer of a case from District 1 to District 2 under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) was proper and whether the defendant is entitled to a default judgment

Docket Entries

2024-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-08-20
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Dib Dudar, In Re Abdur-Rahim
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar — Petitioner