Whether the lower court's procedural limitations improperly precluded petitioner's substantive constitutional claims and denied meaningful appellate review

Question(s) Presented Whether a state appeals Court Can turn a blind eye to a Pro se petitioner's Prime fatte Showritg 6F Distrie¥ Court's lack of Subject matter jurisdiction in order to uphold GQ state procedural bar “which i's Predicates” on a Sixth amendment Violation ? y 7 " arl les A ne | Related Cases Bousley Vs. Unrted States (may if 1998) 523 UL rLI¥ 8S Ct thoy LE, LA 785 page 2 | Carter Vs Stite o¢ Dklakome court oF Criminal Appegls 292 Pad 135-438 C450 page | _Claghocn Vs Brewn 505 p. IA 19P (January 17,1973) pose / Garza Vs doko Supreme Court (February 27, 209) SFM S, 2321395 5, ct. 738203 4,6. dl 2477 Pege 2 Johnson VS Snow Oklahoma Supreme Court 52/ p. 3d (272° (2002), Ok, P62022 WL Ib57GI5 Page 2 Roe VS Flores Orteqa Supreme. Court (Febrmary 23, 2608) S, 4101208, et 102ql45 LE, 2A GES Poze 3 . BEI UWS. DIs80S, 2F.27045 Le RMA A367 Page / J st Amendment page 3,1, 2 Gt Amendment Page 2,3,/ /44 Ainerdm ent Puge /,2,3 : an Fable of Conte ALS we ‘ oplnlhs Belo Uy Jurrsdiction | ConstifuTional AWD Sf alte tor ylroviS(ons Tf Vole A State meat oF Fhe cast ReasOMns Foy Granting writ . | Guest/ on presected es Index To Appendices | TSA 8 OF Pe ee A ppendix-AOLCA. Dental A ppendx —8 py stric Court Dense! : . Append! x—C. petition For Habeas Corpus | MDI REET eee , wateble oF Autorit/ es Unie dtl Shakes Const) tution — SSS Pape LT _ Amend. i ETA Amend. . a | LL*4 Amen [, 2, os oy 7, 17, 20. OK. Const Avt 4, Shuler 7? 4, 2, S. Also. Slates FIZ S)4, $l) oF Title 22@Ag 7 ohlea ourk precedares, wis glenn < Caslh Rule Zz [aes etl eret Sdet, See stlig abe lh @ _ el*] (a) section 144 (@) “of theta dice Cade hk § OS. C. [4ofe (e) : patition*? rdgusstit Complete pre eveptyou Dech (ine te Jge Case S , SS , Bousley Ui United States a ‘te S State May Glee) page De ert x A JShete 19S e agGe hor (A w ehuacy J7 as age ot GavZ4uy. Laheo [febuery a7 20/7). page Johnson i Snow odd}. _ ase J Roe Elores~ Orte 5e bur aty 3, 2000}, ase J SHI ONE “ Uaited states . Tanuary al 160 . age Peaster Ve Stale S92 P.2S Yo a Pese ( . | ee | . I. , cr eo : . , pe IN THE . | SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ; Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. 7 OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at