Can a State summarily deny a defendant's right to self-representation and subsequently bar a constitutional challenge to such because of the defendant's coerced continued cooperation with the court appointed defense counsel that was alleged to be unconstitutionally imposed?

QUESTION PRESENTED Can a State summarily deny a defendant’s right to self-representation and subsequently bar a constitutional challenge to such because of the defendant’s coerced continued cooperation with the court appointed defense counsel that was alleged to be unconstitutionally imposed? PARTIES INVOLVED The petitioner of this petition for writ of habeas corpus is Trey Tarell Bradley (hereinafter “Mr. Bradley”). The respondents are Mike Parson, the Governor of Missouri; Andrew Bailey, the Attorney General of Missouri; Brent Teichman, Associate Judge of the Johnson County Circuit Court; and Denise Welch-Masters, Owner of the Electronic Sentencing Agency (hereinafter “respondents” unless named individually). In addition to the parties aforementioned, the peculiarity of this petition requires the mention of Gary Fenner, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. LIST OF PROCEEDINGS State of Missouri v. Trey Tarell Bradley; 20JO-CR00128-01 State of Missouri v. Trey Tarell Bradley; WD85321 Trey Tarell Bradley v. Mike Parson et al.; 24-00351-CV-W-GAF ‘ . 2