No. 24-5748
LaVanzel Kerr v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affirmative-defense constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure firearms-statute sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a district court apply a U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6) enhancement without resolving a defendant's affirmative defense claim, and is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) unconstitutional when applied to individuals without violent crime convictions?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L May a district court apply a U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6) enhancement without resolving a defendant’s affirmative defense claim? Il. Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) unconstitutional when applied to individuals who have never been convicted of a violent crime? i
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2024)
Attorneys
LaVanzel Kerr
David Aaron Novod — Law Office of D. Aaron Novod, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent