Whether a judge violated constitutional rights by failing to grant injunctive relief, denying right to counsel, and ordering venue transfer in a property dispute case

question presented is deemed to comprise every subsidiary question fairly included therein (Rule 14.1(a)). QUESTIONS: 1. Whether Judge Christine N. Donovan presiding in Petitioner’s (my) case and claim in the Solano County Superior Court violated her oath to protect the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California by: a. failing to grant injunctive relief and failing to issue a Temporary Restraining Order of the taking of my personal property (money) ii by the real parties in interest and thereby abused her discretion and violated my right to be secure in my property and effects from unreasonable seizures and my right to NOT be deprived of my property without due process of law or deprived of equal protection of the laws pursuant to the 4th and 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Sections 7 and 13 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of California”? b. denying my right of counsel to be with me in all aspects of my case and complaint thereby violated my right of counsel of my choice as protected by the 6 and gth Amendment to the US Constitution, and Sec. 24 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of California?; c. ordering the transfer of venue of my court outside of Solano County, thereby violating my rights protected by the 9» Amendment to the US Constitution to hold venue of my court in the County of where I live and wherein the unlawful acts against me were committed?; 2. Whether the justices in the Supreme Court of California violated my right to petition the Government for a redress of my grievances pursuant to the 1s+ Amendment to the US Constitution and Sec. 3 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of California by denying my right to be heard pursuant to my interlocutory appeal as a Common Law Petition for writ of Mandamus and Prohibition? iii PARTIES TO THESE PROCEEDINGS I, Zachary Thomas Horton am the Petitioner. I am, and was at all times, a living sovereign man with my home in Solano County, California. Respondent is Christine N. Donovan, presiding as judge over my case and complaint in the Solano County Superior Court. Real Parties in interest and the defendants in my initial complaint are Ashleigh Nelson and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD (hereinafter Ashleigh). Other Party of Interest is Ricky Dean Horton, my natural father.