No. 24-5765
Robert Lance Walker v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review court-of-appeals evidence-sufficiency judicial-interpretation legal-precedent standard-of-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals misapplied well established precedent when determining sufficiency of the evidence presented
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals misapplied well established precedent when determining sufficiency of the evidence presented.
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Robert Walker
Robert Michael Golden — The Law Office of Robby Golden, Petitioner
Robert Michael Golden — The Law Office of Robby Golden, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent