Whether the Commonwealth Court abused its discretion by applying Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) to conclude waiver of error, conflicting with Pa.R.A.P. 1925 and procedural requirements

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED =~ : ot Pages: [1]. WHETHER THE COMMONWEALTH COURT ABUSED TTS DISCRETION OR COMMITTED AN ERROR OF LAW, BECAUSE APPLYING Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) TO OONCLUDE WAIVER OF APPEILANT'S “ONLY CLAIM" IS IN CONFLICT WITH Pa.R.A.P. 1925, WHERE THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ORDER A 1925(b) STATEMENT AND THE APPELLANT DID NOT FILE ONE? [II]. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION OR COMMITIED AN ERROR OF LAW, BECAUSE THE COURT FATLED TO CONSIDER THAT IN REM FORFEITURE WOULD VIOLATE THE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, IN CONFLICT WITH SUPREME COURT HOLDING IN Commonwealth V. 1997 Chevrolet, 639 Pa. 239, 160 A.3d 153 (Pa, 2017)? SUGGESTED ANSWER IS: 9/25/2024