Did the California Supreme Court and lower courts err in denying petitioner's writs and motions, potentially violating constitutional rights under the 4th, 5th, 7th, and 14th Amendments?

Question Presented : Did the Supreme court of california in error, abuse discretion and show bias in denying Petition (S285953 ) on sept 18 24 and application for stay and left unresolved conflicted issue of law and factual issue? ( violation of 7th,5th amendment , 4th and 14th amendment) ? Did the 5th district appeal court in error, abuse discretion and show biased in denying “Writ of Mandate” and stay Requested (Fo88202}on june 26 24 based on tulare superior court ORDER April 11 2024 ruling (Motion to vacate/Motion to new trial and disqualification judge hillman based on march 18 24 judgment ) and March 18 24 judgment without Jury Trial OF JUDGE HILLMAN for the reason “Petitioner challenges different trial court rulings”? .Did 5th district court judges Levy APj, Smith J, Snauffer,J made error, abuse discretion and showed bias when denying writ mandate F088202 on june 26 24 (violation 7th,5th amendment , 4th and 14th amendment rights of petitioner) ? .Did Tulare Superior court violate 7th amendment rights , in error and abuse discretion preventing jury trial Feb 13-15 247 Did tulare superior court or Judge Hillman Showed Error,abuse authority and Bias in Facts finding in March 18 judgment ? Did tulare superior court or Judge Hillman Showed Error,abuse authority and Bias in his March 18 . ‘. judgment ? .Did judge Hillman make an error, abuse discretion and showed bias in denying motion to vacate March 18 24 judgment (without jury trial) on April 11 24? .Did judge Hillman make an error, abuse discretion and show bias in denying motion for a new trial (that occurred without a jury trial)on April 11 24? Suggested Answer: Yes 2 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons: Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons: Pursuant to Rules 8.208 and 8.488 of the California Rules of Court, the undersigned identifies the following interested entities or persons per rule 8.208. . APPEARANCE FOR Defendant and Respondent : City of visalia et al All defendant represented by the attorney HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP Visalia Location 100 Willow Plaza, Suite 300 Visalia, California 93291 Phone: (559) 636-0200 /Caren Curtiss . Wa aan ~ y e / 10/10 /24 3 TABLE OF CONTENT: QUESTION