No. 24-5794

Juan Daniel Sierra-Jimenez v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2024-10-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: breach-of-agreement circuit-split plain-error-rule plea-agreement prejudice-prong sentencing-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Circuit Split exists related to how lower courts examine Defendants' compliance with the third prong of the plain error rule in cases involving unpreserved breach of plea agreement claims

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The question is presented as follows: Whether a Circuit Split exists related to how lower courts examine Defendants’ compliance with the third prong of the plain error rule (prejudice prong) in cases involving unpreserved breach of plea agreement claims and whether this Court should address the same providing guidance as to the correct legal standard that should be applied in such review. STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-08
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-01-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2025.
2024-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 9, 2024 to January 8, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-08
Response Requested. (Due December 9, 2024)
2024-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2024)

Attorneys

Juan Daniel Sierra-Jimenez
Raul Santiago MarianiMariani Franco Law, PSC, Petitioner
Raul Santiago MarianiMariani Franco Law, PSC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent