Question not identified.

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WERTH PENALTY ERAUR LPDN THE COURTS) OF THE BRENT UNITED STATE ot AMZRICAR Founth Lincu’ Couft ct Appeals ERRORER Ls NDOT GRANTING TOTAL RELIEF From Fedcral : Tudoment of istrict Count and ALL South Caralian Counts BRSER on TUBILAL TRANSZRIPTs EVIR ENCE FRAUD UPON The LOURTS. A Trail that Lontinucd Dyer Theee Decades Lonspiracy, Betwren A torn Ly Benzralod South Larolina iil\ian Edgzn Salter, Soliton Bown d V. Muyres, Solicton BelV INTENTIONALY RELIRERATELY Parsentch THREE BIEEERENTLY GO RES | UNDTR SIDORN DATH iw TAREE MIFECRENT TORY TRALs Scheme Yo Subvan Penyuny Constituizs WERT PENALTY FRAUB WPON THE CDURT COMPUIER COURT EVINENLE= READ | [ore Ce oi A. Coopzn\s Moore Ruggstl2 2002 SC SupREMt Lount Rulings FACT = ACQUITIEA ot FDRBERY = EVIBENTE MOSTL LIRLOMSTANTIRL NOT DUERLSHELMING | QL State Vs Sodtherlawd Hugdstls1yat SOS LY Roliwa SELDND STORY=Four People AY Munden B.Coopen s Wandan VAGER RVER CORT INST Bec’) 2025 “THIRD STDRY= TL2d PEOPLE AL Munden=Wrelag Court | WAZELAlas blass Co Vs HARAFORA EMPIRE CO 3d US 238 WH4-4s B4 SCY A171 88 Led 1280 (1944)