No. 24-580

Richard Cotromano, et al. v. RTX Corporation

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-11-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion daubert-standard dose-reconstruction environmental-exposure expert-testimony gatekeeping-function
Key Terms:
ClassAction Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the abuse of discretion standard requires the Circuit Courts to assess whether a trial court performed its gatekeeping function adequately rather than whether it was performed at all?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is as follows: Whether the abuse of discretion standard requires the Circuit Courts to assess whether a trial court performed its gatekeeping function adequately rather than whether it was performed at all?

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-11-26
Waiver of right of respondent RTX Corporation to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2024)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Richard Cotromano, et al.
Mara Ritchie Poncy Hatfield — Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A., Petitioner
Mara Ritchie Poncy Hatfield — Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A., Petitioner
RTX Corporation
William D. Gohl — Bartlit Beck, LLP, Respondent
William D. Gohl — Bartlit Beck, LLP, Respondent