No. 24-5813

In Re Thomas Critton

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: amendment-violation constitutional-rights federal-status jurisdictional-principles preemption-doctrine state-action
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why did the state of Louisiana violate constitutional rights and jurisdictional principles?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Quesbtion(s) Presented 1. Why am I Petitioning The U.S. Supreme Court? 2. Why I didn't I exhaust state court remedies? ‘ 3. Why I didn't file in The U.S.District Court? 4. Why did the state of’ Louisiana violate my 13th amendment? 5. Why did the state of Louisiana violate my 14th amend of Liberty? 6.°Why did the state of Louisiana convict “4 U.S. : "Corporation of a crime? 7. Why did the state of Louisiana violate Art.I~Sec.10 of the U.S. Const. ? 8. Why is custodian Michele Dauzat have to show of restraint? 9. Why is this a Preemtion matter? 10° How can the state assume jurisdiction over a Federal status 11. Why is this the right court?

Docket Entries

2024-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-08-22
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Critton, In Re Thomas
Thomas Critton — Petitioner